open-source-licensing-how-does-open-source-licensing-work-open-source-license-compliance

Making Open Source Licensing Easy for Modern Teams

Did you know that over 90% of codebases rely on open-source components? That’s a lot of great, free software at your fingertips! But here’s the catch: each component comes with its own license, dictating how you can use, modify, or share the software. Managing all these licenses, known as open-source license compliance, can quickly become overwhelming. So, how do modern teams keep everything straight without drowning in legal details? In this post, we’ll dive into the world of Open Source Licensing and share practical tips to simplify compliance.

What is Open Source Licensing?

Open-source licenses lay out the rules for how you can use software. They usually fall into two categories:

  • Permissive licenses, like MIT and Apache 2.0, give developers a lot of freedom. You can use the software however you want, as long as you give credit to the original authors. In 2022, permissive licenses accounted for 78% of all open-source components, showing an increasing trend toward more flexible licensing (up from 76% the previous year.
  • Copyleft licenses, like GPL, come with more strings attached. If you modify and distribute GPL-licensed software, you need to share your changes under the same license. In short, any changes you make must also remain open-source. Copyleft licenses account for up to 35.6% of the issues found in software composition analysis audits, meaning many organizations struggle with compliance.

The type of license you choose matters, especially when you mix open-source with proprietary code. A permissive license can give you flexibility, while a copyleft license might force you to share modifications you’d prefer to keep private.

How Does Open Source Licensing Work?

When a developer releases software under an open-source license, they’re basically setting the rules for how others can use their work. Here’s a breakdown of the most common types:

Permissive Licenses:

These licenses, like MIT and Apache 2.0, are easy to work with. They let developers use, modify, and distribute the software freely. The only catch? You need to give credit to the original author. These licenses are perfect for teams that need flexibility without worrying about complex compliance issues.

Copyleft Licenses:

Copyleft licenses, like the GPL, have more conditions. If you modify GPL-licensed code and share it, you must also make those modifications open-source. This helps ensure that the software—and any changes—remain available to everyone. It’s a great way to promote open collaboration, but it can also be limiting if your project relies on proprietary components. 

Dual Licensing:

Some projects offer dual licenses, where developers can choose between an open-source license or a commercial one. This option gives businesses the flexibility to use open-source software in proprietary projects while avoiding some of the stricter copyleft rules.

Understanding how these licenses work helps teams avoid legal headaches. It’s all about knowing the rules before you start building with open-source components.

Why Do Teams Struggle with Open Source Licensing?

As projects grow, so do the number of licenses you need to track. It’s not just about using open-source software—it’s about keeping track of what licenses apply to each dependency. And if you don’t stay on top of it, you could end up accidentally violating a copyleft license and be forced to open-source your proprietary code.

Many organizations struggle with compliance due to the sheer number of licenses and their varying requirements. This complexity can lead to legal risks if not properly managed. For example, in the case of Versata vs. XimpleWare, non-compliance led to multiple legal proceedings, highlighting the critical need to understand license obligations from the start. Similarly, in Versata vs. XimpleWare and VMware vs. Christoph Hellwig. Both companies faced lawsuits for incorporating GPL-licensed code into proprietary software without adhering to the license terms.

How Xygeni Makes Compliance Simple

Xygeni takes the pain out of open-source license management. Here’s how:

  • Real-Time Monitoring: Xygeni constantly scans your dependencies, flagging any potential license conflicts before they cause issues. This helps your team avoid costly mistakes, especially with restrictive licenses like GPL or AGPL.
  • Automated License Reports: Xygeni generates clear, easy-to-understand license reports for your entire codebase. Whether you’re in an audit or just need an overview of your project’s compliance, these reports help you stay organized and confident.
  • SBOM Generation: With Xygeni, creating a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is easy. This document lists all the components and their licenses, making it simple to track compliance and avoid surprises down the road.
  • Customizable Policies: Want more control? Xygeni lets you customize license policies to fit your project’s needs. This way, you can block components that don’t meet your compliance standards and keep your project on track.

Keep Compliance Simple and Secure with Xygeni

Managing open-source licenses doesn’t have to be a complex, time-consuming process. With tools like Xygeni, your team can automate open-source license compliance, reduce legal risks, and ensure that open-source components are always used responsibly. Xygeni’s automated scanning, real-time monitoring, and SBOM generation make it easy for modern teams to stay compliant without slowing down development.

By integrating these tools directly into your CI/CD pipeline, Xygeni helps you build secure, compliant software without headaches. Let Xygeni handle the complexity of open source license compliance so you can focus on delivering great software.

Secure your Software Development and Delivery

with Xygeni Product Suite