Xygeni vs Checkmarx

The Checkmarx alternative:
Better security. Less constraint.

Built for the AI-native SDLC. Deployed where your code lives.

See how Xygeni compares to Checkmarx on your own repositories.

Alternative to Checkmarx

Four differences that matter

What makes Xygeni the right replacement

Detail in the four slides that follow. If you only remember these, that's enough.
01
Deployment freedom

Every Xygeni capability (ASPM, AI Triage, AI Remediation, MCP server, AI Inventory, Shield on the endpoint, DevAI in the IDE) runs in your chosen deployment. SaaS or on-premise, both hybrid by design. Code never leaves your infrastructure.

02
Pre-signature malware

MEW analyzes every new package at publication, behaviorally, before any researcher has labeled it. Reactive threat-intel feeds wait for disclosure, and the exposure window is everything in between.

03
AI Security as architecture

Three controls: AI Inventory for visibility, Shield + DevAI for active defense at endpoint and IDE, CoreAI for governance and audit trail. The EU AI Act asks for evidence, not a product.

04
Predictable economics

No per-module unbundling, no cost explosion as your team and apps grow. Built for multi-year budget planning.

Side by side

Capability snapshot

Capability Checkmarx
On-prem ASPM + multi-SCM in one deployment ✅ Native multi-SCM + on-prem ASPM ⚠️ Legacy CxSAST only
LLM sovereignty (model + location) ✅ Customer-chosen model + location ⚠️ Depends on IDE
Pre-signature malicious package detection (MEW) ✅ Behavioral, pre-disclosure ⚠️ Reactive threat-intel
Malware detection across the SDLC ✅ Packages + CI/CD + containers ⚠️ Packages primarily
SLSA provenance + in-toto attestations ✅ Native attestations ⚠️ SBOM only
CBOM — Cryptography Bill of Materials ✅ Native, post-quantum ready ❌ Not available
Developer endpoint protection + IDE plugin ✅ Shield (endpoint) + DevAI (IDE) ⚠️ IDE plugins, no endpoint protection
Behavioral anomaly detection in SCM and CI ✅ Native ❌ Not available
Secrets with auto-revocation + merge block ✅ Auto-revoke + block ⚠️ Detection + validation
Remediation Risk at method level ✅ Method + call sites identified ⚠️ High-level guidance
Code quality in the same platform ✅ Quality and security, one prioritization ❌ Not available

Competitor information is based on publicly available documentation, reviewed September 2026. Spotted something out of date? Let us know.

Differential

Same deployment. Different content inside.

Two deployments. Scanner always runs in your environment — code stays put.

Full platform, anywhere.

Full platform, anywhere. SaaS or on-premise, both hybrid by design. The scanner runs in your environment.

Code never leaves your infrastructure during a scan, in both deployments.

The full platform runs air-gapped, with zero connectivity.

LLM sovereignty: the customer chooses the model and the inference location.

European HQ, EU jurisdiction, ISO 27001 certified.

Checkmarx

SaaS-only modern stack

ASPM, Assist agents, MCP — cloud-hosted only

AI Supply Chain Security — cloud-hosted only

Source code uploaded to vendor environment during scan

Legacy CxSAST on-prem available — without ASPM, Assist, or AI

Differential

Both detect malware. The difference is when.

Reactive threat-intel feeds wait for disclosure. MEW catches at registry publication, behaviorally.
Package published
T = 0
Behavioral signal
Minutes to hours
Researcher discovers
Days to weeks
Signature published (reactive feeds catch here)
After disclosure
Xygeni
MEW catches here

Behavioral analysis at registry publication — before anyone has labeled the package malicious. Detection extends to pipelines, container images, and source-code commits. Catches reverse shells in pipelines, malicious commands in build scripts, and tampered artifacts — not just bad packages.

checkmarx
Checkmarx catches here

Detection limited only to components.

Differential

EU AI Act doesn't ask for a product. It asks for controls.

Three layers: visibility, active defense, governance with audit trail.
Visibility
01
AI Inventory

Continuous discovery of every AI asset as a dependency graph (model → dataset → endpoint → agent → MCP server → coding tool). AI-BOM auto-generated per scan, with provenance, lineage, and license.

ACTIVE DEFENSE
02
Shield + DevAI

Shield protects the developer endpoint: age-based install control for packages, IDE extensions and plugins, blocking of malicious IPs and domains, isolation of a compromised machine, and one policy set by your security team. DevAI secures the IDE with an MCP server, alongside Copilot, Cursor, Claude and Windsurf. Two products, two surfaces, one platform.

GOVERNANCE
03
ASPM

Posture, business-impact prioritization, executive reporting, and an immutable audit trail of every blocked or permitted action. The evidence an EU AI Act auditor will request.

FAQs

Is Xygeni a good alternative to Checkmarx?

Yes, if you need a modern platform on-premise. Every Xygeni capability, including ASPM, AI Triage, AI Remediation, AI Inventory, Shield and DevAI, runs in SaaS or on-premise, with the LLM and inference location you choose.

No. Xygeni ASPM ingests Checkmarx findings and applies AI Triage, Explanation and Remediation to them, so you can start on top of what you run today and consolidate when you are ready.

Yes. The full platform runs on-premise, air-gapped or hybrid. With a local model, the AI capabilities work fully offline.

MEW analyzes every new package behaviorally at registry publication, before any researcher has labeled it. Detection also covers CI/CD pipelines, container images and source-code commits.

A Cryptography Bill of Materials inventories the cryptography in your software. Xygeni generates it natively, so you know what to migrate as post-quantum requirements arrive.

See the difference on your own code

Bring the questions your Checkmarx evaluation left open. We will walk through them on your stack.

Recognized for Pioneering ASPM Solution
Top Software Composition Analysis Tool
Devops Dozen 2023 Finalist Home-min
Best DevSecOps Solution